翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Anti-Chinese violence in Washington
・ Anti-cholesterol
・ Anti-Christian Movement (China)
・ Anti-Christian policies in the Roman Empire
・ Anti-Christian sentiment
・ Anti-Christian violence in India
・ Anti-Christian violence in Karnataka
・ Anti-Cigarette League of America
・ Anti-circumvention
・ Anti-clerical art
・ Anti-clericalism
・ Anti-clericalism in Latin America
・ Anti-climax
・ Anti-climb paint
・ Anti-Clock
Anti-cnn
・ Anti-collision device
・ Anti-collision light
・ Anti-Comintern Pact
・ Anti-communism
・ Anti-Communist Bolivian Front
・ Anti-Communist Labor Union of the Philippines
・ Anti-Communist League of the Caribbean
・ Anti-Communist Martyrs
・ Anti-communist mass killings
・ Anti-communist resistance
・ Anti-communist resistance in Poland
・ Anti-communist resistance in Poland (1944–46)
・ Anti-Communist University Students Committee
・ Anti-Communist Volunteer Militia


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Anti-cnn : ウィキペディア英語版
Anti-cnn
Anti-cnn.com〔(anti-cnn homepage )〕 (since 2009, April Media〔) is a website established by Rao Jin, who was a 23-year-old Chinese student at the time, in response to what he identified as "the lies and distortions of facts from the Western media" concerning the 2008 Tibetan unrest and the People's Republic of China's national unity. The anti-cnn site states its purpose as "collect, classify, and exhibit the misbehavior of Western media".〔 (網民自發反擊外媒瞎報拉薩事件 ) www.takungpao.com 26 March 2008〕 According to the website, the phrase "anti-cnn" does not exclusively indicate its objection to the American company CNN, but also to many other Western media sources, including the BBC, ''Der Spiegel'', ''La Repubblica'', n-tv, ''Bild'', Fox News Channel and RTL. The website also states, "We are not against the western media, but against the lies and fabricated stories in the media. We are not against the western people, but against the prejudice from the western society."
Rebecca MacKinnon has described the site as an example of "() nationalist commons".〔
== Claims and responses ==
Anti-cnn has claimed that Western media has frequently implied that it has been the Chinese police, and not rioters, who have killed people. Description of events during the 2008 Tibet incident were positioned alongside phrases such as 'Chinese crackdown', giving a false impression that the Chinese authorities, not the rioters, were the cause of the injuries and killings. According to Rao Jin, CNN and BBC only reported selectively, and grossly misrepresented the incident.〔SBS Dateline, 6 Aug 2008 () video link〕
Rao was invited to attend an interview show by the China Central Television in the program of Oriental Horizon (东方时空). The title of the show was "Warning to CNN: why the Chinese Internet folks got angry" (正告CNN:中国网民为何愤怒). During the interview, Rao said that he had established the site "to expose the facts, to make the facts publicized to as many people as possible". The site now claims about 500,000 visits per day, 60% of which are from China.〔 (东方时空 正告CNN:网民为什么愤怒?(Oriental Horizon Warning to CNN: Why Chinese netizens are angry.) ) news.xinhuanet.com, 1 April 2008〕
A ''Washington Post'' report detailing Chinese reactions to Western coverage quoted Rao as saying that more than 1,000 people have e-mailed him, volunteering to spot distorted reports in Western media. A Chinese analyst said that protests may only push Chinese government to adopt a more hard-line position. The report ended with a comment from Michael Pettis, a professor of management, which said "as China becomes a world power, there is going to be a lot more scrutiny and criticism. Just as Americans have learned to deal with it, the Chinese are going to have to learn to deal with it. My hope is that after the anger there will be some reflection on the complexity of these issues."〔Jill Drew, ("Protests May Only Harden Chinese Line" ), ''Washington Post'', March 24, 2008. (p. A09)〕
Some of the media accused of making distorted reports have given replies. CNN made a formal response to the charges of the cropping of cover pictures and mismatching captions, but asserted that the selection of material was "appropriate for the editorial context, and will not cause any confusion".〔(CNN statement on Tibet coverage ) CNN.com, 28 March 2008〕 Der Spiegel mentioned the site in an editorial, where it referred to the argument over the credibility of Western media on this particular issue with the headline "the war over words". Der Spiegel however refused to respond to the charges made, implying that the site is part of "Chinese propaganda". They also blamed the Chinese government's media control policy, saying that it forces the media to turn to "hard to confirm" evidence and "increases the risk of making mistakes and errors", which in turn "makes it easier for the Chinese authorities to accuse them".〔(A War of Words over Tibet ) www.spiegel.de, 1 April 2008〕
This site first received global attention in the PRC Foreign Ministry spokesperson Qin Gang's regular press conference on 27 March 2008 when he was asked to comment on the website. One journalist put forward a question whether the Chinese government had financed or supported the anti-cnn website. Qin Gang's response was that "It is the irresponsible and unethical reports that infuriated our people to voice voluntarily their condemnation and criticism."〔(Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Qin Gang's Regular Press Conference on March 27, 2008 ) www.fmprc.gov.cn, 27 March 2008〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Anti-cnn」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.