翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Philogyny
・ Philogène Auguste Joseph Duponchel
・ Philogène Wytsman
・ Philoi
・ Philokalia
・ Philokalist
・ Philolaus
・ Philolaus (crater)
・ Philolexian Society
・ Philoliche longirostris
・ Philolochma
・ Philological Library
・ Philological Quarterly
・ Philological Society
・ Philologus of Sinope
Philology
・ Philomath
・ Philomath (disambiguation)
・ Philomath Bulletin
・ Philomath High School
・ Philomath School District
・ Philomath, Georgia
・ Philomath, Oregon
・ Philomathean Literary Society (Erskine College)
・ Philomathean Society
・ Philomathean Society (New York University)
・ Philomaths
・ Philomatic society
・ Philomecyna
・ Philomecyna camerunica


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Philology : ウィキペディア英語版
Philology

Philology is the study of language in written historical sources; it is a combination of literary criticism, history, and linguistics. It is more commonly defined as the study of literary texts and written records, the establishment of their authenticity and their original form, and the determination of their meaning.
Classical philology is the philology of Classical Sanskrit, Pali, Tamil, Greek and Latin. Classical philology is historically originating principally from the Library of Pergamum and the Library of Alexandria around the 4th century BCE, continued by Greeks and Romans throughout the Roman and Byzantine Empires, preserved and promoted during the Islamic Golden Age and eventually taken up by European scholars of The Renaissance, where it was soon joined by philologies of other languages of non-Asian (European) (Germanic, Celtic), Eurasian (Slavistics, etc.) and Asian (Sanskrit, Persian, Arabic, Chinese, etc.). Indo-European studies involves the comparative philology of all Indo-European languages.
Any classical language can be studied philologically, and indeed describing a language as "classical" is to imply the existence of a philological tradition associated with it.
Because of its focus on historical development (diachronic analysis), philology came to be used as a term contrasting with linguistics. This is due to a 20th-century development triggered by Ferdinand de Saussure's insistence on the importance of synchronic analysis, and the later emergence of structuralism and Chomskyan linguistics with its emphasis on syntax.
== Etymology ==
The term ''philology'' is derived from the Greek (''philologia''), from the terms (''philos''), meaning "love, affection, loved, beloved, dear, friend" and (''logos''), meaning "word, articulation, reason", describing a love of learning, of literature as well as of argument and reasoning, reflecting the range of activities included under the notion of . The term changed little with the Latin ''philologia'', and later entered the English language in the 16th century, from the Middle French ''philologie'', in the sense of "love of literature".
The adjective (''philologos'') meant "fond of discussion or argument, talkative", in Hellenistic Greek also implying an excessive ("sophistic") preference of argument over the love of true wisdom, (''philosophos'').
As an allegory of literary erudition, ''Philologia'' appears in 5th-century post-classical literature (Martianus Capella, ''De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii''), an idea revived in Late Medieval literature (Chaucer, Lydgate).
The meaning of "love of learning and literature" was narrowed to "the study of the historical development of languages" (historical linguistics) in 19th-century usage of the term. Due to the rapid progress made in understanding sound laws and language change, the "golden age of philology" lasted throughout the 19th century, or "from Giacomo Leopardi and Friedrich Schlegel to Nietzsche". In the Anglo-Saxon world, the term philology to describe work on languages and literatures, which had become synonymous with the practices of German scholars, was abandoned as a consequence of anti-German feeling following World War I. Most continental European countries still maintain the term to designate departments, colleges, position titles, and journals. J. R. R. Tolkien opposed the nationalist reaction against philological practices, claiming that "the philological instinct" was "universal as is the use of language".〔"Philology: General Works", ''The Year's Work of English Studies'' 4 (1923), 36–37.〕〔Richard Utz, "''Englische Philologie'' vs. English Studies: A Foundational Conflict", in ''Das Potential europäischer Philologien: Geschichte, Leistung, Funktion'', ed. Christoph König (Göttingen: Wallstein, 2009), pp. 34–44.〕 In British English usage, and in British academia, "philology" remains largely synonymous with "historical linguistics", while in US English, and US academia, the wider meaning of "study of a language's grammar, history and literary tradition" remains more widespread.〔A. Morpurgo Davies, ''Hist. Linguistics'' (1998) 4 I. 22.〕〔M. M. Bravmann, ''Studies in Semitic Philology''. (1977) p. 457.〕 Based on the harsh critique of Friedrich Nietzsche, US scholars since the 1980s have viewed philology as responsible for a narrowly scientistic study of language and literature.〔•“Them Philologists: Philological Practices and Their Discontents from Nietzsche to Cerquiglini.” ''The Year’s Work in Medievalism'' 26 (2011): 4-12〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Philology」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.