翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Central Puebla Nahuatl ・ Central Pueblo, Colorado ・ Central Pulse ・ Central Quebec School Board ・ Central Queensland ・ Central Queensland Capras ・ Central Queensland FC ・ Central Queensland News ・ Central Queensland NRL bid ・ Central Queensland Territorial Separation League ・ Central Queensland University ・ Central Rabbinical Congress ・ Central Radio ・ Central Radio & TV Tower ・ Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Georgia v. Pettus ・ Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey v. Mills ・ Central Railroad of Indiana ・ Central Railroad of Indianapolis ・ Central Railroad of Long Island ・ Central Railroad of New Jersey ・ Central Railroad of New Jersey Freight Station ・ Central Railroad of New Jersey Station ・ Central Railroad of New Jersey Station (Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania) ・ Central Railroad of New Jersey Station (Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania) ・ Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal ・ Central Railroad of Pennsylvania ・ Central Railroad of Pennsylvania (1891–1918) ・ Central Railroad of South Carolina ・ Central Railroad Station (Shreveport, Louisiana) ・ Central Railway Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey v. Mills ： ウィキペディア英語版 Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey v. Mills ''Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Mills'', 113 U.S. 249 (1885), involved a case where the Court of Claims had dismissed a petition of the claimants, regarding the rejection of two items sued for: (1) labor done and materials furnished by the claimants in constructing the coffer dams, and in performing the work necessarily connected therewith and preliminary to the masonry work for the piers and abutments, (2) loss and damages resulting to the claimants in consequence of the reduction of the dimensions of the piers and abutments made subsequently to the making of the contract.〔(Central R. Co. of N. J. v. Mills, 113 U.S. 249 (1885) ) ''Justia.com''〕 ==Background== The decision of the Court of Claims in regard to item (1) was that the claimants had not shown that the written contract did not express the intent of both parties as to the coffer dams, and that even if that court were satisfied that the claimants executed the contract in mistake of their rights, there was no evidence that the defendants shared the mistake. Its decision in regard to item (2) was that it would be disposed to regard the case, on the facts, as one for equitable interposition for the purpose of further inquiry and the ascertainment of the rights of the parties in equity if it had jurisdiction, but that the statute did not authorize it to entertain those considerations, because, in the proceedings before it, it could hear and determine only claims for labor done and materials furnished by the claimants under their contract with the defendants. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey v. Mills」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.